Skip to content

Decolonizing Our Hearts and Minds

October 6, 2012

In this article a clear, coherent argument that Europeans are the first victims of colonization and conquest by the forces of imperialism and civilization.  He argues the construct of “whiteness”, identification of the needs of the elite as the needs of society, and the imposition of top-down control are the results of this colonization.  Re-creation and reconstruction, two processes Heathens are very familiar with, are necessary to repair the damage done by this ancient colonization of the European mind.

Part I: Preliminary Thoughts & Explorations

By Tlalli Yaotl (Recovering Wasi’chu/Wetiko)

Author’s note: I have been considering how to approach writing about this issue for some time now, and I’m still not sure I know how to go about it. I am going to talk about some things that will make many people uncomfortable, and even angry. I am going to talk about how the “non-indigenous” can—or more precisely why the “non-indigenous” should—become indigenous once again. What I am not going to do, however, is provide a formula or model for doing so. I intend only to explore my own thoughts on the matter, which are alive, evolving, and ever-changing. They may also, at times, be a bit chaotic and disorganized, though I am attempting to be as clear and precise as possible. This piece of writing is a mechanism to help me in the collection, arrangement, and refinement of my own feelings, thoughts, premises, and arguments.

I have labeled this piece Part I because it will undoubtedly remain extremely incomplete and require follow-up articles and discussions (for example, I am conscious of the fact that this piece is highly limited to my own understanding as based in my own identity as a white cis-hetero-male presenting individual from the “United States”, which may be socially constructed and imposed from above and outside, but none the less carries very real consequences in our society, culture, and civilization). We speak often of decolonizing our hearts and minds of settler privilege, colonial mentality, internalized racism, etc., but not often enough about what it means to decolonize our hearts and minds from our own state as colonized, uprooted, displaced people. As always, criticism, critique, and commentary is welcome and encouraged.

For those of us who are the descendants and direct beneficiaries of colonists, settlers, and displaced peoples, the question of decolonizing ourselves, our hearts and minds, and the stories, narratives, and pathways that brought us to where we are today, is a complicated, touchy, double-edged one. How do we understand our identity and narrative? How do we understand who we are and where we came from? How can and do we reclaim what has been lost or forgotten? And how does that understanding inform our strategies and tactics?

Settlers and “white” people are, for the most part, the descendants of the Earth-based indigenous tribes of “Europe,” who are amongst the first colonized native peoples under the constant expansion of civilization and its empires. Other displaced peoples are the descendants of the Earth-based indigenous people of other parts of the world, such as “Africa” and “Asia.” Our colonization is so old, and so deep, that we no longer even remember who we really are, or where we really came from. At best, we refer to other nation-state identities when referring to our familial and cultural origins.

The descendants of the tribes of Europe were so successfully and completely colonized and assimilated that we have even been conditioned to confuse the narratives of civilization and empire with our own, identifying with the ruling-class elite, thus confusing their interests with our own, which we in turn work to protect and defend. Thus we were forced off our ancestral lands and into the cities and factories of industrialism, shipped around the world to feed growing industry in newly colonized areas, and thus we continue to destroy the Earth that gives us life today, because we think industrial civilization feeds, clothes, and shelters us, rather than the Earth herself. Even if we intellectually understand all of this, we continue to do it. Even if we see what we are doing, and what has happened and is still happening, still we cannot stop. That is how thoroughly we have been colonized and assimilated.

Whiteness itself is a social construct and manufactured identity given meaning and power only through its application within a white supremacist racist hetro-patriarchal culture, and as a tactic used by the elite to keep the people divided and fighting amongst themselves, rather than taking aim at the true source of their oppression (an exploration of the origins and social construction of “whiteness” as an idea and an identity is a topic deserving an article—or better yet a book—of its own, and not something I will attempt to deconstruct here and now).

To be indigenous means to be rooted in a land base, in a place with which one’s people have a long and intimate history as inhabitants. Today, particularly amongst radicals and those who fancy themselves “allies” or aspire to become such, “indigenous” has become synonymous with good, and less outwardly, “non-indigenous” has become synonymous with bad. Some would undoubtedly argue against this, but I would suggest it is completely appropriate given an understanding of the meaning of what it means to be indigenous as articulated above.

It is good to be rooted in a land base, and have an intimate sense of place coupled with an extensive cultural narrative regarding origins (“good” in this case being defined as sustainable and healthy for humans, non-humans, and the land bases they share). It is not good to be uprooted, displaced, and torn from the very land base which once sustained such a sense of place and cultural narrative. It is not good for individual people, for cultures, or for land bases and their many non-human inhabitants.

It is therefore both attractive and mutually beneficial for all to aspire and actively work towards once again becoming indigenous in place, by which I mean firmly rooted in a land base with which one’s culture has an intimate and deep-rooted connection.

What is clear is that, due to the vagaries of civilization and industrial capitalism, the land bases have been effectively depleted and toxified, and the human population so vastly and artificially inflated through the use of ancient sunlight in the form of fossil fuels, that it is unrealistic and undesirable to simply return to our ancestral homelands. What is also clear is that many of us have completely lost any trace of narrative that would truly inform us of our origins and aboriginal narrative, and it is also clear that many of us come from a meeting of many cultures from many places (I, for example, can trace my patrilineal heritage to Celtic and Norse tribal ancestry and my matrilineal ancestry to Aztec, Mayan, and Incan roots, or perhaps some subsidiary tribes under the territorial jurisdiction of those civilizations). What then are we do to? Split ourselves into various sections and send one in each direction to the lands our ancestors came from? Obviously such courses of action lack fundamental viability in the real world.

It is of vital importance to clarify that for those of us for whom personal and cultural liberation through the reclamation of ancestral Earth-based ways is unrealistic and/or impossible (because they have been obscured and/or lost through nearly total colonization and assimilation), personal and cultural liberation is possible through the act of re-creation. All culture is created by people in places, and when lost, it can be remade.

But it is highly important that this cultural and personal reclamation and re-creation of identity and narrative (true personal and collective liberation leading to a sense of selfhood and identity through which the illusory dichotomy between individual and community, ego and collective, dissolves before our eyes and the two become inseparable and one, as they truly are) does not come in the form of cultural and spiritual appropriation. Such a course is not only undesirable, it is unnecessary. Again, all human culture was created by people in place, and what has been lost can be genuinely remade in place (rather than appropriated from others), as new in content and form as the land base from which it originates and emanates.

One person who has contributed significantly to my thought process and understanding of what it means to be a descendant of the tribes of “Europe” is indigenous activist John Trudell, who’s words and work I highly recommend.

As Trudell puts it:

What happened to you, the descendants of the tribes of Europe, we know what happened to the Indians here, but what happened to the Indians here…was a behavior of what had happened to the tribes of Europe. And what I find interesting, more than about Columbus being what he was, what I find the most interesting about he Columbus thing is that when he got off the boat and he said to us “Who are you?” and we said to him, “We’re the human beings,” and he said, “Oh, Indians,” it wasn’t because he thought he was in India, I mean that might be some kind of thing, but in reality what it was really about, by the time Columbus got here the descendants of the tribes of Europe no longer had a perceptual reality of what it meant to be a human being. They didn’t know what it meant anymore. Because they had been owned, they were property, they were victims, they were victimized, they were tortured, they were the hunted, they were the property, they were the lesser things. They did not know what it meant to be a human being anymore. Whenever the Romans or any of these people started showing up, when religion emerged, when they got together and figured out a nice good ole’ industrial god religion…saying, a man owns the Earth and fuck all of you because a man owns the Earth and can do what he wants to do. Once they put that thing into motion, that’s what they used against the tribes of Europe to erase that spiritual concept of reality. So, this is why…and they had the inquisitions…in the medieval times. Isn’t that an interesting concept? If that was the medieval times, then exactly what part of the evil are we in now? But by 1100 AD, the decedents of the tribes of Europe had been taken off basically their hunting grounds, their roaming grounds, that tribal relationship to the land had been altered because by then church and state as it was evolving had claimed ownership of all of them. Whoever owned the land owned the human beings that were a part of the land. But the problem they had still–about 1000 AD—the problem they had was they had restricted tribal movement, but they still had this perception of being, spirit. See, they still prayed to ancestors, they still prayed to spirits. So they still were perceiving reality from a spiritual perception. So this couldn’t do. So what the church did at that time—it happened to be the Catholic church at that time—but what the church did at that time…was that it declared itself to be god’s authority on Earth, and that it had the right to wage war to possess the souls of the godless heathens, that it was its religious obligation to wage war to possess the souls of the godless heathens. And see, then because…the decedents of the tribes of Europe…see at that time, sexism wasn’t quite as ingrained yet so the women still had their role in the society…so when the church created it’s inquisitions, the woman was one of the main targets…because they had to erase and alter that connection…and they killed as efficiently as they possibly could. And what was interesting about this religious ritual that no one wants to talk about was that you were accused and then you had to be interrogated, tortured, executed, property seized. Alright, and they killed as efficiently as they possibly could for five-hundred years. So by the time Columbus got here and got off the boat, they didn’t have a fuckin’ clue what it meant to be a human being! Reality! Didn’t have a clue! And excuse my language but it’s not my language and you shouldn’t a taught it to me.

At Judi Bari’s memorial, Trudell spoke:

Because we are made up of the earth — our common ground, so to speak — we are all the descendants of tribes. Each and every one of us is a descendant of a tribe. We have genetic memories. Inside of our genetic memories, that power connection exists to our ancestral past. We are all descendants of tribes.

But the tribes of the planet earth have encountered a technological religious mindset that removes all spiritual value and real value about life from the earth and puts it into theoretical heavens or hells. And it does it under a male image of a male dominator god.

In our tribal ancestry each and every one of our ancestors resisted that notion, that imposition. Tribes of Europe, tribes of Africa, tribes of here. Every tribe resisted it.

Elsewhere, Trudell is quoted as saying:

The People of America, they are the children of the tribes of Europe. And when they were still the tribes, they worshiped the earth as the mother, and had an entirely different perception of reality. And that perception was to keep the harmony and the balance as much as possible, and somewhere historically in time, there appeared the dominator theory of god. This dominator theory of god was that god was a male, and everything was subservient. This theory was used as technology, and its culture, to make weapons of destruction, to improve the weapons of killing. The tribes then had this imposed upon them through fear. As the tribes were broken down through the various faces, the technological civilizations, whether it was through the romans, or whoever it was, it was all evolving. The Tribes were attacked and made to give up the ways of the earth, and submit to the new god.

This happened to the Europeans before it happen to us. But what happen to us, happen to the European children of the tribes also. But it happened maybe 800 years before it happen to us. Actually, in its own form, at that particular time within civilization, when the Europeans came to the western hemisphere, Europe was going through the inquisition. The inquisition was basically the church establishing authority over the people of the earth… to maintain authority. They had 500 years of inquisition. And In the inquisition women were special targets, because they were trying to erase that tribal memory of the earth as the mother. But the deal was, if you were accused of speaking against the church, you were automatically guilty, and they had to torture you, and you had to tell them all the names that you could give them, and they sized all your property.

It is clear. We are all of this Earth. We are all indigenous here, even if the origins of life itself on this planet are not. Our physiology, biology, and genetics are adapted to this world and have evolved here for untold eons. The state most suited for sustainable behavior and life ways is an indigenous state, defined as a state of a rooted sense of place and an intimate relationship with one’s land base, both personally and culturally. The enemy of indigenous existence is civilization itself.

These have been a few of my thoughts, and a few thoughts from others, on these matters. They are by no means exhaustive or complete, but rather, are meant to serve as a point of departure, or rather a point of continuation, for dialogue and discourse surrounding such thoughts, ideas, and practices.

For those of us who take these feelings, thoughts, and ideas seriously, and wish to inform our strategies and tactics from their basis, the question becomes: Where do we go from here?

The author of this article is a recovering Wasi’chu/Wetiko. He is a (late) twenty-something year-old male-bodied individual of mixed-blood descent, residing in the occupied Ute Territories of Turtle Island, located in the bioregional area colonially known as the “American Southwest.” He is a descendant of the tribes of “Europe” as well as those of the “Americas,” both of which were eradicated and assimilated by the same dominator culture. He is currently in the process of decolonizing his mind and reclaiming his identity by trying to uncover the story of his ancestors, which is also his own, and liberate his narrative from that imposed upon him by civilization and the ruling class (with which they convince us to mistake their interests for our own). He is a Wild Earthling, and does not identify with illusory (and illegitimate) nation-state constructs, nor does he require such constructs to verify and validate the legitimacy of his existence. He can be contacted at earthwarriors(at)riseup(dot)net

No comments yet

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: